A
CONFIDENTIAL
For information (29.7.86)
LAST PAPER
NOTE FOR EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
ХССІ (86)35 Я
Copy No...
HKK 360
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
QUEEN'S GARDENS/TREGUNTER DISPUTE WITH HONG KONG LAND 2 1AUG 1986
Д
Members are aware of the dispute with Hong Kong
Land in the Queen's Gardens/Tregunter case.
2
Basically the intention was that Government would make a private treaty grant of the Queen's Gardens site to Hong Kong Land in return for a premium of $103 million, 83 flats in Tregunter, and the undertaking of certain road works by Hong Kong Land.
3
the site.
Hong Kong Land paid $103 million and handed over the 83 flats. They took possession under licence of Queen's Gardens and demolished the 24 flats standing This all took place in advance
in advance of the finalisation of the Conditions of Exchange, and in 1983 Hong Kong Land refused to
the deal complete
unless
was Government re-negotiate on property values current in 1983. refused to do this and the present proceedings ensued.
4
prepared to Government
Both Government and Hong Kong Land accept that the terms of the agreement were "subject to
were "subject to contract and that the final conditions were not signed. Government's case has been that although there was no legally binding contract, nevertheless, on established principles of equity, Hong Kong Land should not be allowed to withdraw in the light of all that had been done by both the Government and Hong Kong Land. On 10th
10th May 1985 the High Court found against Government and this finding was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 31st January 1986. The terms of the judgment are at Annex A. Government has obtained leave
leave of appeal to the Privy Council and the appeal is set down for hearing in November 1986.
4
5
the prospects
of
success
in the An opinion on Privy Council was obtained from Gerald Godfrey,
who Q.C., represented the Government in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. It is his view that an appeal has
an appeal has a good chance of succeeding on the basis that the Hong Kong Courts had not drawn the correct inferences from the facts proved before them and that this has resulted in an obvious injustice which it is open to the Privy Council to rectify.
CONFIDENTIAL
#