<<<<

1

<<<<

OUT TELEGRAM

(CONT)

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL

Caveat

Precedence

ROUTINE

2 hade

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

had been a change in circumstances which might lead to refusal

of leave to enter under paragraph 13 of the Rules. Erosion of

the value of the entry certificate in this way would, they say,

defeat its very purpose. Two years is normally the maximum

The

period for which the Home Office can feel content that any

individual will continue to meet the requirements of the Rules.

The Home Office agreed to an extension of these arrangements to 4

years as a special concession following Lord Belstead's approach

in 1982.

Consider this to be longer than ideal and say that

it is not possible to go further. A BDTC who intends to visit

the United Kingdom regularly and who has complied with any

conditions attached to his stay in the past should find no

difficulty on entering the United Kingdom subsequently.

stamps in his passport will be sufficient indication that he is a

genuine visitor. Ironically, this means that those who might

claim long validity multiple-entry certificates actually have no

real need for them in practice. The Home Office have been

concerned for some time that long validity entry certificates

serve merely as status symbols and the low take up rate tends to

support this view. Last year only 14 were issued. So far this

year only 10. It is also relevant to note that last year only

about a third of BDTCs visitors to this country had entry

certificates of any sort.

24

25

6.

26

27

28

29

7.

30

///

31

//

32

33

34

The Home Office argue that there is also the problem that

any special treatment for those from Hong Kong would inevitably

lead to pressure for the introduction of similar arrangements for

others who might be seen to be in a comparable position.

On this second proposal we are prepared, if you wish, to

return to the Home Office to press strongly for multiple visit

entry certificates of more than four years validity for Hong Kong

BN (0)s and BDTCS. We do not hold out much hope of success,

particularly in view of the low take up of 4 year certificates in

the past, but we can see that such a proposal would be

For distribution order see Page

Catchword:

4

presentationally,

XY 48A (REV)

Share This Page