20
مدله
view. According to the Home Office, sloes the Minity flixfence. The answer to
the question cainel
A
Section 4(5)
a
слал
the Lords
Q
only.
para
покол
5 above is that
in BNA 1981 by
result of intere lobbying
by Hong Kong. Section (465) is therefore
Kong section. Naporision for
which
to
ލ
Hoy
be backfiring,
Crown Severin had othowing been intended. have copied In Grange's
the Home Office.
JMAN 87,
minute to
The regal advice is timely night. I wonder if, in the light of the
obriously
House of Commons debate, we might citizenshup to BDTC with
the British armed services
а
during
armend the Order to give
Butish
Hong long connection who served in the Second Wald War? It does seem
anomalous that people who served in Hong Kong units have a clavin to registration under the BVA, but there who were in the British Army
uit.
There
would
be
do
rejections that lits of other people would then and why
they shouldn't receive simular tizatiment, bur
we could defend special treatment for Hong Kong ex-sourcenon as a political respouse to a particulas political situation. The case could easily be distinguished- the Hong Kong situation is unique. Pichefs Mrs Repton should they this out on the Waddington?
in
Doudan 28.11