GRS 650
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
FM HONG KONG
TO PRIORITY FCO
TELNO 313
OF 300635Z JANUARY 86
INFO PRIORITY PEKING
nie need fei.
vain
THIS TI
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
ADV
12 FEE 1986
MKK 30
M Shall need to submi
DESK OFFICE.
HIY
PA
bition lakan
INDEX
HONG KONG : CONTROL OF PUBLICATIONS CONSOLIDATION ORDINANCE (CAP 269)
1. THIS ORDINANCE PROVIDES THE GOVERNMENT WITH SWEEPING POWERS TO
SUPPRESS JOURNALS FOR PUBLISHING MATERIAL PREJUDICIAL TO THE SECURINTY OF HONG KONG. IT WASAZED ENACTED IN 1951 FBGUWPYB QOTOT AND WAS DESIGNED TO MEET THE THREAT OF A FLOOD OF SEDITIOUS PROPAGANDA FROM CHINA, FOLLOWING THE COMMUNIST TAKE-OVER. WE HAVE RECENTLY BEEN CONSIDERING WHETHER TO REPEAL IT.
2. THE ARUGMENTS FOR REPEAL MAY BE SUMMARISED AS FOLLOWS:
(A) THE POWER TO SUPPRESS PUBLICATIONS PROVIDED BY THIS ORDINANCE
IS UNACCEPTABLE IN A FREE SOCIETY.
(8) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CAN CONCEIVE OF NO CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH
HE WOULD BE PREPARED TO USE THE POWERS.
(C) THE POWERS WERE TAKEN AT A TIME WHEN IT WAS UNCERTAIN WHETHER THE NEW CHINESE GOVERNMENT WOULD BE WILLING TO TOLERATE
HONG KONG'S CONTINUED EXISTENCE AS A SEPARATE ENTITY. THEY HAVE
ONLY EVER BEEN USED TO SUPPRESS 3 PAPERS DURING THE 1967 DISTURBANCES WHEN AN EMERGENCY HAD BEEN DECLARED. THE POLITICAL
POSITION HAS CHANGED: HT WOULD NOW BE UNTHINKABLE FOR THESE POWERS
TO BE USED AGAINST THE COMMUNIST PRESS IN HONG KONG.
(D) WITH THE APPROACH OF 1997, IT IS NOT DESIRABLE TO LEAVE SUCH AN ORDINANCE, HOWEVER REDUNDANT, ON THE STATUTE BOOK, SINCE THERE
IS A REISK THAT THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT MIGHT PRESSURE THE SAR
GOVERNMENT INTO INVOKING SUCH POWERS.
сод
correction
CG6/2
(D) THE PRESS AND PUBLIC OPINION IN HONG KONG HAVE BEGUN TO FOCUS ON THE EXISTENCE OF LEGISLATION OF THIS KIND, AND TO EXPRESS ANXIETY ABOUT THE RISK OF ABUSE, ONCE THE RESTRAINING EFFECT
OF THE LINK OF AUTHORITY WITH BRITAIN DISAPPEARS (SEE FOR EXAMPLE
THE POINTS MADE BY MR WONG KWOK-WAH, VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE HK
JOURNALISTS ASSOCIATION IN HIS CALL ON MR LUCE ON 5 JUNE 1985)
(F) ALL NECESSARY POWERS TO DEAL WITH PUBLICATIONS WHICH INCITE
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ARE COVERED BY OTHER LEGISLATION: IN A REAL
CRISIS EMERGENCY POWERS COULD BE TAKEN.
3. ARGUMENTS AGAINST ARE AS FOLLOWS:
CONFIDENTIAL
\(A)