CONFIDENTIAL
Barton Looks ok: Gul
Pone's Margine intitul
(7 MON
скажите
previous caverpaduce
pover 8 y paremal /06
Zayday
17, I think
Miss JR Binstead
Hd Loc Sec (NATO/Plans)
Ministry of Defence Main Building
Whitehall
London SW1
Th
Shipping Policy 2
Department of Transport
Room P2/070
2 Marsham Street London SW1P 3EB
Telex 22221
Direct Line
Switchboard
GTN 212
MKK 175/1 RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
3 1 JAN 1986
01-212 8494 01-212 3434
B2
3 January 1986
Dear Jame
DESK OFFICER
INDEX
PA
REGISTRY Action Taken
отела
by $3
HCDC AND MERCHANT SHIPPING
I am sorry it has taken me so long to respond to the comments from you and others on the revised draft evidence for the House of Commons Defence Committee on Merchant Shipping that I circulated in August. I am grateful for those comments I received, have taken them into account as best I can, and put a revised draft up within the Department of Transport. As you will see from the copy enclosed, I have suggested that you may want to do the same in the Ministry of Defence, but this is of course a matter for you.
I ought to comment on the points in your letter of 10 September (D/ACDS (L) 22/12/7). First, I have deleted the old paragraph 2, putting it as an appendix to my minute so that my Ministers can see what the debate has been about. Secondly, I envisage that the whole paper should be passed to the RCDC classified "Confidential". We in Transport, probably the Home Office too, will need to do what you have put in hand, identifying the passages that need sidelining. Moving on to your
more particular comments, and referring to the
new paragraphs:
Paragraph 16. I think the last sentence is sensible enough, and even a useful corrective to the natural bias many people may have when they come to this topic.
Paragraph 18, last sentence. This did in fact take into account legal advice. It has been further amended.
Paragraph 25. Given that the first sentence refers to emer- gency legislation I didn't find an amendment terribly easy to introduce here, and as you say the point is made in paragraph 18. I have tried to deal with your point about the earlier paragraph 27 by incorporating it into what is now paragraph 25. In principle the information does come earlier, when the annex is referred to.
Paragraph 26. I think we have to say something about emergency powers, and the Home Office and Cabinet Office seem content with the oblique approach.
CONFIDENTIAL