Bu 10.6.86
Mr Leeks HKD
Alkk 124/3 Meeky
19 JUN 1986
FROM: PAUL FIFOOT
DEPUTY LEGAL ADVISER DATE: 29 MAY 1986
HONG KONG : LETTERS PATENT AND ROYAL INSTRUCTIONS
за
28
1. I have now seen Hong Kong telno 1624, which was anticipated in some respects by my meeting with Mr Michael Thomas on 22 May and the amendments agreed with him as reported in my minute of that date to you.
24
2. Of the proposals made in telno 1624 for amendment of the Letters Patent, I agree A(1). I have already taken on board so much of A(3) as I agree. As I explained in the minute accompanying my first draft of the Letters Patent, I believe in being cautious about A(2) and I would therefore propose to keep Article 2(2).
3. With regard to the Royal Instructions, I agree with B(1). Mr Thomas and I had already agreed a variation of the new Rule 1 of Clause XXV.
4.
With regard to the proposal in paragraph 3 of Hong Kong telno 1624, I would see no objection to a despatch as to the terms in which grants be made. However, I think the proposal made in that paragraph 3 is unduly brusque and I would suggest that it is redrafted in a more decorous manner.
Whanden.
Ref&A, PC
A, PLTD. Acta Tel.
Celfar
Paul Fifoot
In Swith cleared with Weslifert or swith.
ル
Braft Tel in response
alfs Can
how
dove
і тво
Ct. 3/6
you
Ca ofe
response to HK Teha 1624+1864
take accout
мой
ас
wa 4 above
Jp wa
the space provided in the best Некраси
otherwise amend as
Thank. Ear. JB/6
you
see fil? сыг зор
т