SECRET

*

سمر

be

aborted.

This would be undesirable and would contravene the

Joint Declaration provision quoted in parag above.

حدة توا

was

11. That of course is not to say that the SAR courts could enquire into the substance of decisions of the CPG concerning foreign and defence affairs: such matters are reserved for the CPG. Thus, if

the SAR's courts needed to establish, for example, whether a state

is recognised by China, or whether China is in a state of war with

another state, the courts would be bound by (and would not be able to inquire further into) an authoritative CPG ruling on the matter.

Thus, according the SAR's courts the ability to interpret those

parts of the Basic Law dealing with foreign and defence affairs

would not infringe China's sovereignty or the jurisdiction of the CPG on foreign and defence affairs.

to

D. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Y

Y

12.

fundamental

A further area which is of

importance to the

maintenance of confidence in Hong Kong is the preservation of

individual rights and freedoms as set out in the Joint Declaration.

13. Press reports in Hong Kong on discussions of this subject at

various Basic Law drafting and consultative fora suggest a great divergence of views. There have been suggestions that in order to

preserve rights currently enjoyed by residents of Hong Kong, a quoté " Bill

of Rights "unquote should be enshrined in chapter III of the

Basic Law dealing with basic rights and obligations

inhabitants of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. idea of a "Bill of Rights" creates the following difficulties:

of the

The

(a) Substantial provisions regarding rights and freedoms exist in the common law and ordinances enacted in Hong Kong, and

would lead to

difficulties

any attempt to codi fy or catalogue them

S

omissions,

confusion and

unnecesary

interpretation and enforcement.

in

-4-

SECRET

Share This Page