CONFIDENTIAL

C

Background and Argument

3.

Zhou Nan's call on Mr Renton will be our first

Ministerial contact with the Chinese since the Secretary of

State's meeting with Wu Xueqian on 23 May, when our papers on the structure of government in Hong Kong were handed to

the Chinese. The call will give us an opportunity to outline again the main element of our thinking. Zhou Nan

may or may not be briefed

Chinese to give the initial

not he does, he may

*he Sund that we hand No obeckon in Nisciple to discussion in the Fas

Sensitive. We

also sucd There could be no such thing as a permament lagenda

to our ideas.

or Whether

response propose that discussion should be taken forward at the next meeting of the Joint Liaison Group in London in July.

4.

the meeting

later on 23

was not the

This suggestion has already been made at

between Dr Wilson and Ke Zaishuo in Brussels

May. Dr Wilson's response was that the JLG

only possibility: in some ways it was better to discuss this detailed matter through other channels (FCO telno 973

to Hong Kong, para 9). If however the Chinese insist on

discussion at JLG IV we are

it not well placed to resist: was agreed after the tense exchanges on the subject at JLG II that it should remain on the JLG agenda.

5.

that

subject

But there are both practical and political arguments although the against using this channel. The complex subject matter forum

could better be handled in a more informal context, in

discussion between those with the closest understanding of

Hong Kong's administration.

And the Governor feels

strongly

if discussion of the

in JLG IV

becomes know in Hong Kong this could "lead to suspicion that the Chinese are being given an oportunity

an oportunity to nullify

the 1987 review" (Hong Kong telno 1696). He may be

over-stating

argument (the Ambassador feels that it might be possible to restrict JLG discussion to an informal meeting in the JLG margins). Nevertheless it would certainly be preferable in terms of Hong

of Hong Kong opinion if

such discussion could be diverted into less formal and

public channels.

dem. D

E

the

CONFIDENTIAL

Share This Page