CONFIDENTIAL
4.
I do not think that this is entirely academic. There will be great sensitivity in Hong Kong now to any legislation which appears to infringe the rights of the individual unreasonably.
5. I should be happy to discuss
more convenient.
this
if you would find that
16 October 1985
деваний
AC Galsworthy
Hong Kong Department
I apologize for the delay
( caused
in part by
week's leave).
miint
2.
my
1
10/10 1
sand
that
1
Jaw
no
Legal
to Shijeet.
asprets
reason
in partulan. First,
In reaching
Itas
cone hyim
1
conside
two
the proposal
does
not
conthet
with
itma's
human rights obligations
in
1
respects ↑ Hong Kong it.
the
Covenants. (Nor, indeed, would
Converton,
it
conflict
ith
the European
Hurren
appliceth.) Second,
1
considered
ths
indeed
similar
very
to proposts in
the
UK
Right
the proposal
for dealing
itt
the proties | ding trafficking,
3.
nor I
certainly
writing
This is
ast
ав
the end
He
1
day,
ва
pricy question. I would
dissert
froma
M
the
1973 fil
your prom 2 ( though I
21
that clearly explains
han jelen
m
Enjection.
CONFIDENTIAL