11
perhaps
CONFIDENTIAL
indefinitely thereafter i s
profoundly worrying for the
following reasons:
(a) A s the length of stay in camps, particularly closed camps,
increases and the prospects for resettlement for most refugees
remain poor or worsen, despair may set in and give rise to
disturbances of which we have already had a foretaste (para 7(a) above). Hunger strikes will probably give way to riots. There are children now growing up in the camps who will have lived their whole
lives in confinement.
(b)
for resettlement.
Long term detention is not a suitable way to prepare refugees
UNHCR and others are concerned that refugees who
spend a long time in closed centres will lose
lose their will to regain their self-sufficiency.
(c) The local Chinese population of Hong Kong consider it unjust
that Vietnamese are allowed to remain indefinitely in Hong Kong
while illegal immigrants from China are repatriated. They find it difficult to accept that public money should be spent on building, equipping and running refugee centres rather than on
on social services
and other amenities for the local population. (The cost to the
the Hong
Kong government of providing asylum for Vietnamese refugees in the
next financial year will be HK$ 103 million, of which HK$ 22.5
million will probably be reimbursed by UNHCR). There is a general feeling that Hong Kong is being asked
is being asked to shoulder more than its fair
share of the Vietnamese refugee burden.
(d) The Hong Kong Government and HMG will face strong humanitarian
lobbying to end the closed centre policy,
policy, especially if there are
outbreaks of violence.
(e)
Legal questions may be raised about the closed centre policy;
(£) Finally, it is possible that, if the problem continues unsolved
becomes more serious, we may face Chinese pressure to set our
house in order before 1997.
or
CONFIDENTIAL