CONFIDENTIAL

PRIORITY

<<<<

reconsider its decision not to increase its offtake during

1985/86. It was most important for HMG in the context of SCORRI

for there to be a positive US response. All the other potential

resettlement countries, small and large, whom

HMG had been lobbying, would look to the United States. The

absence of a US response specifically linked to the UK decision

to relax their criteria would be noticed. By contrast a US

offtake would encourage others.

3 Nash also drew on our Telno 1979 and gave Neighbour the

statistics on percentage off-take from Hong Kong and other first

asy um destinations in para 1. He also emphasised the

desirability of including long-stayers in any US off-take.

4.

Neighbour undertook to pass on Nash's request that the US

should reconsider its decision. He also asked the following

questions to which we are providing the US Embassy here with

answers (as given in brackets after each question):

(a)

(b)

How many Vietnamese refugees (VRS) have already arrived

in the UK in the post-SCORRI exercise? (20 have arrived

so far. A further 17 will arrive at the end of

December.)

Over how many years will our off-take be spread? (The

refugees will be admitted at a rate of about 40 a month

over the next year or so.)

a

Share This Page