JA2ALA

CON FID EN TIAL

HKC 2463/2

RECEIVED IN REGISTRY

02 JAN 1986

SCORRI DIPLOMATIC CAMPAIGN: RESPONSE BY RE

DESK OFFICER | REGISTRY

LEMENT COUN TRITES

480

UNITED STATES

Secretary

request.

of State's meeting with Mr Shultz: took note of

Good US intentions but limited capacity (UKMIS New

York telno 788, 26.9.85, folio 241)

Resettlement figures for FY86 not yet decided. But hope to make immediate "quick

gesture" (Douglas) (Washington telno 2752,

1.10.85, folio 248)

>

response.

Consulate General in Hong Kong: conscious of benefit of

of early Undertook to seek views of Washington on possibility

of relaxing admissions criteria to make more refugees from Hong

Kong eligible (Hong Kong telno 2080, 5.10.85, folio 264)

Dr Wilson's meeting with Wolfowitz, State Dept: will look at

H on g Kong's problems

9.10.85, folio 287)

sympathetically

Van Egmond (State Dept) in London:

(Washington

telno 2809,

US want to be helpful but

some refugees. Decision

decision may depend on UK's willingness to

to accept more than 500

and Hong Kong's willingness to absorb

may be deferred till after Blue Ribbon Panel have reported on

their visit to SE Asia (Nov)

report unlikely before end of

-

year (0 Walker minute, 16.10.85, folio 296)

Woodhouse meeting with Purcell in Geneva: FY 85/6 resettlement

levels still not agreed. Emphasised importance of Blue Ribbon

Panel review of policy would enable Hong Kong to make

a t high level.

reallocation of places.

-

Hong

its

case

Kong might benefit from regional

US would be happy to help trigger

renewed interest in Hong Kong in reply to UK initiative.

Meeting "encouraging" (Woodhouse telex 14.10.85,

folio 316)

-

see also Gomersall teleletter 15.10.85, folio 320)

Purcell meeting with Woodhouse in New York: US will continue to

help Hong Kong; but consider number involved in UK initiative to

be small (Woodhouse telex 24.10.85, folio 350) (See also 359)

Indo Chinese refugee panel to visit South East Asia (but not

Hong Kong) 3

25 November

(Gomersall

teleletter

25.10.85,

folio 358)

CONFIDEN TIAL

Share This Page