RESTRICTED
(g) Questions on UNHCR criticisms of policy
13
ANSWER:
Aware that UNHCR has criticised policies of "humane deterrence"
under which refugees are detained for prolonged periods. HMG
and Hong Kong Government share distaste for such measures.
Introduced reluctantly. Necessary evil. We of course look forward
to the day when the flow of arrivals from Vietnam reduces and the
level of resettlement increases to an
increases to an extent that enables the Hong
Kong Government to relax the policy.
Closed centres run in cooperation with UNHCR who currently pay
the annual carla expenditure one-third of cost/ (HK$ 20 million out of a total of HK$ 60 million in 1984). The figure for the total cost
total cost to HK
KK was HK$ 110 million [UNHCR also provide
"dented services & have recruited an educational! Co-ordinator for the clored!
centres]. [Background: UNHCR Notes on International Protection, August 1984 which was quoted by British Refugee Council in "Behind Barbed
Wire" contained following statement, to which the question may
refer.
"While it will thus be seen that there may be situations, both with regard to individual asylum-seekers and to large-scale influx, in which measures of detention may be justified, this is not the case
where asylum-seekers are detained with the sole object of
discouraging further arrivals. It has become evident that in certain countries the practice of detaining asylum-seekers is part of a clearly perceptible policy of discouraging the arrival of further asylum-seekers. In these countries refugees are frequently confined in prison or detained under prison-like conditions for prolonged periods of time in accordance with a policy of so-called "humane deterrence". Needless to say practices of this kind - given their underlying motivation are at variance with the principles of international protection".]
RESTRICTED