ATTORNEY GENERAL
H.STEEL.CMG OBE
LEGAL SECRETARY
HKK040/24
RECEIVED IN
FANTRY
- 2 JUL 1985
-
DESK OFFICER
INDEX
Our Ref: 400/85/148
PA
→ Copris for TM. Galsworthy
CONFIDENTIAL
Exfol
RF
140
Trettem original is ma
LAW OFFICERS' DEPARTMENT
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
LONDON, WC2A 2LL
pa Gart fele
タ
26 June, 1985
бек
ARS
3/7
plu
Sir John Freeland KCMG
Legal Adviser
Foreign and Commonwealth Office Downing Street
London SWI
Saw
John,
M. Elman M. Pull
bcj23/6
Lo 7 28/6
AN Beylow you with t
the Bles good are meny
M
Ми
27/1
eutstat
HONG KONG AND THE GATT
Thank you for your letter of 19 June. I have shown the papers to the Attorney-General and I preface his advice by saying that he has asked me to express his gratitude for Paul Fifoot's excellent Memorandum.
لفم
First, the Attorney-General sees no problem in construing Article XXVI 5 (c) of the GATT as permitting a declaration under it to be made in respect of a territory which, in legal terms, is still a dependency. Indeed, he thinks that the phrase "possesses or acquires" points incontestably to that conclusion.
Second, as regards the meaning of the word "establishes", he inclines to think that it means no more than "makes out a convincing case for the proposition".
But if it denotes as well (or instead) the performance of some formal act to
bring about the required state of affairs, he thinks that the issuing of the proposed Entrustment, coupled with the making of the necessary declaration under Article XXVI 5(c), would suffice for that purpose.
Third, there is the central question of whether, despite Hong Kong's primitive
constitution and the retention in law (and the reality of the possible invocation
in practice) of HMG's residual powers, we can respectably contend that the
189
/practice
CONFIDENTIAL