CODE 18-77

NGOLNICIBU

1242

TUCC 040/24 1

Mr Lewington ECD (E)

1.

21 FEB 1985

-*

7.

RENEWAL OF THE MULTI FGØRE ARRANGEMENT

Refere

waha

ра

!.

Your minute

of 14 February

and telephone call of 15

February.

2.

The draft letter enclosed with your

minute refers to the two key points for Hong Kong,

i.e.

that as one of those hurt most by the MFA (paragraph 13 of the DTI draft paper) it has a strong interest in liberalisation, and that we must also take into account the recent agreement with China about Hong Kong's future in considering options which will affect Hong Kong's

trade.

3.

On the first of these points it i s plain, given the

territory's dependence on international trade

and

the

importance of the textiles and clothing sectors, that it is in Hong Kong's interests that there should be no

strongly renewal of the MFA restrictions

in

restrictions

and

for

an

end

We must

to

the

at the end of 1986. expect the Hong Kong Government to lobby hard for this. Failing full liberalisation, they may be expected

to press for a reduction discriminatory system which in effect penalises Hong Kong and some others for their competitiveness

and for eschewing protectionism. They would certainly react badly to variation" (c) in paragraph 20 of the DTI draft

discrimination in favour

of poorer LDCs

-

"possible further

and also to variation

(a): clothing and clothing accessories exports are worth much more to Hong Kong than textile exports( The clothing sector is the largest single sector within the Hong Kong manufacturing industry, employing some 284,000 workers, 33% of Hong Kong's industrial workforce) All these points might be brought the analysis you suggest of

you suggest of the likely approach of the NICs.

4.

in

be

The second point, concerning the Agreement, should also covered

in the DTI paper. The point to make here is that if the UK were to endorse me a sures which further restrict Hong Kong exports, especially if these were to discriminate against Hong Kong in favour of other places of origin, we should be open to the charge (from

(from Hong

Hong Kong itself or China) that we were going against the spirit of the Agreement, by which HMG and the Chinese Government agreed

on the object of maintaining Hong Kong's stability and prosperity.

5.

In this connection, you should also be aware of paragraph 4 (a) of Annex II of the Agreement, dealing with the Sino/British Joint Liaison Group, which will be established later this year. I attach a copy of the Annex for your reference. A s you

Hong Kong's future participation

in the

see,

can

MF A

is

Page 225Page 226

RESTRICTED

Share This Page