GRS 350

UNCLASSIFIED

FM HONG KONG 120755Z MAR 85

TO IMMEDIATE F C O

INFO IMMEDIATE PEKING

TELEGRAM NUMBER 508 OF 12 MARCH

INE

REK 048/21

1 2 HAR 1985

9

w

at

BASIC LAW: REPORTS IN TA KUNG PAO AND WEN WEI PAO.

1. TODAY'S TA KUNG PAO CARRIES AS ITS FRONT PAGE LEAD AND WEN WEI

PO AS BACK PAGE LEAD ALMOST IDENTICAL STORIES QUOTING

''AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES FROM PEKING' AS SAYING THAT AT LEAST

10 HONG KONG PEOPLE WOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE DRAFTING OF THE

BASIC LAW. SUB-HEADLINES SAY THAT THESE COULD INCLUDE HONG KONG

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND UMELCO MEMBERS IN THEIR PERSONAL

CAPACITIES. MOST INDEPENDENT PAPERS ALSO CARRY THE SAME STORY.

2. THE ARTICLES QUOTE THE SOURCE AS SAYING THAT THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE PUT TO THE NPC SESSION WHICH IS DUE TO MEET SHORTLY, AND THAT CHINESE LEADERS ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT THE IDEA. THE ARTICLES

FURTHER SAY THAT THE CHINESE SIDE WELL UNDERSTANDS THE DEMAND OF HONG KONG PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE IN DRAFTING THE BASIC LAW AND

TO PUT FORWARD THEIR OPINIONS. THE ARTICLES SAY THAT HONG KONG

PEOPLE WILL OCCUPY A SIZEABLE PROPORTION OF PLACES ON THE DRAFTING COMMITTEE, BELIEVED TO BE MORE THAN 10 OUT OF A COMMITTEE NUMBER ING ALTOGETHER '' SEVERAL TENS OF PEOPLE'', MAYBE AROUND 50.

3. IF THIS SUGGESTION IS APPROVED BY THE NPC, IT IS EXPECTED THAT

THE COMMITTEE MIGHT COME INTO EFFECT FROM MID TO LATE APRIL.

AT PRESENT NO NAMES HAVE BEEN PUT FORWARD FOR THE DRAFTING

COMMITTEE AND THEREFORE PEKING WOULD WELCOME SUGGESTIONS FROM

HONG KONG PEOPLE AS TO WIDELY REPRESENTATIVE FIGURES WHO MIGHT

PARTICIPATE. THE SOURCE, AGREEING THAT THE HONG KONG PARTICIPANTS

SHOULD BE WIDELY REPRESENTATIVE, SAID THAT SOME OF THE PARTICIPANTS

WOULD BE HONG KONG DELEGATES TO THE NPC AND CPPCC, BUT THERE WOULD

BE A NEED FOR OTHER HONG KONG PEOPLE. IN ORDER TO BE EVEN-HANDED,

THESE MIGHT INCLUDE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND UMELCO

MEMBERS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITIES.

4. THE SOURCE ALSO SAID THAT THERE WERE TWO

GENERAL VIEWS ON HOW HK OPINIONS ABOUT THE BASIC LAW

SHOULD BE COLLECTED: ONE WAS TO ESTABLISH A CONSULTATIVE

COMMITTEE AND THE OTHER WAS TO FORM AN OPINION COLLECTION COMMITTEE.

AS REGARDS THE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE, IT COULD TAKE VARIOUS

FORMS AND COULD OPERATE IN VARIOUS WAYS, BUT THE CRUCIAL POINT

I WAS THAT

Share This Page