QUESTION

7. Are there good prospects for expatriate civil servants serving on agreement terms?

a) before 1997

b) after 1997

8. In your view are there good prospects for expatriate civil servants serving on permanent

and pensionable terms?

a) before 1997

b) after 1997

9. Does the draft agreement

of promotion and a career?

adversely affect your prospects

a) before 1997

b) after 1997

10. Does the draft agreement

guarantee that your conditions

of service will be maintained?

a) before 1997

b) after 1997

11. Are you happy with the system of appointing civil servants and advisers as set out in the draft agreement?

12. Are your existing rights protected under the draft agreement?

YES NO DON'T REMARKS

QUESTION

14

5

25

26

34

KNOW ONLY

17 15

3

24 13

a3

9

10

15

235

29

5

4

57

43

8

∞ a

9

es is

5

5

B. REDUNDANCY

13. Are you satisfied with the arrangements indicated in the draft agreement for public servants to remain in employment and continue their service?

14. Do you wish to be given the opportunity to choose whether or not you will work for the future H.K. S.A.R. Government?

15. Would you be willing to give an oath of allegiance to the H.K. S.A.R. Government as a pre- condition to continued

YES NO DON'T REMAF

KNOW ONLY

27 7 6

9

30 7 1 11

employment in an individual

capacity after 1997?

19

17 2

11

21

15

7 26

15

5

11

2=

12

16. If you would not wish to work for the future H.K. S.A.R. Government do you consider that you should be compensated for loss of a career, pension, employment or gratuities?

17

20 0

12

17

16 6

10

C. PENSIONS

17. Does the draft agreement guarantee protection of your pension to your satisfaction?

3 3 3

40

26 8 3

12

**********

1997 SURVEY - ANALYSIS OF POSITIVE REPLIES

A. STABILITY PROSPERITY, CONTINUITY

IN YOUR VIEW:

1. DO

YOU THINK THAT THE DRAFT AGREEMENT SHOULD BE ACCEPTED?

This question drew the strongest 'yes' response in the survey but was heavily conditioned with the remark that there was no choice. The strongest element responding 'no' was in the oldest permanent and pensionable group. Some younger officers indicated an element of 'Don't Know".

GROUP

YES%

NO%

DNK%

TOTAL

P42-

94.6

3.6

1.8

56

P43+

94.2

5.8

103

Average

94.3

5.0

0.7

159

A42-

91.2

5.0

3.8

159

A43+

92.0

8.0

88

A?

88.6

11.4

44

Average

91.0

6.9

2.1

291

Overall

92.2

6.2

1.6

450

Average

-

6

-

-

Remarks included the following:- Better than nothing best of a bad job would have preferred British Administration and international status a good political face save

- consider the alternatives - statements that it's this agreement or no agreement should not be ignored Hong Kong should remain as a British Colony until full independence is granted.

Hobson's all or nothing choice best agreement one could expect no point in fighting the inevitable no alternative with a take it or leave it attitude unless Assessment Office is taken seriously by both sides nothing better is likely to be made available - if this agreement is not accepted by the British Government, the Chinese Government will impose its own version unilaterally which is unlikely to be an improvement on paper seems OK who knows what will happen later too loosely worded in many clauses take it or leave it best agreement possible if PRC is to regain sovereignty no reasonable alternative searched for

-

-

stupid question the white paper

it and so have I

-

- its not worth the paper used to print Hong Kong has got to make the best of

-

a fait accompli neither UK or China is willing to negotiate another agreement no matter what response it is given by Hong Kong - alternative likely to be worse

China has sell out by British Government won every round - politically too late to reject it — 92% of Hong Kong reverts in 1997 anyway depends on

-

:

>

Share This Page