CONFIDENTIAL

5792

1

4.

WE DO NOT THINK MINISTERS WILL SEE ANY DIFFICULTY IN

REPEATING DURING THE DEBATES ON THE WHITE PAPER THE ASSURANCES AS

TO THE RIGHT OF ABODE ENDORSEMENT ALREADY GIVEN TO PARLIAMENT.

THE DETAILED WORDING IS STILL TO BE DISCUSSED.

C.

ARTICLE 4(2)

5. THE FIRST VERSION OF THE WORDING PROPOSED BY OSWALD CHEUNG IS

BROADLY ACCEPTABLE, SUBJECT TO MINISTERIAL APPROVAL, BUT FOR ACCURACY WE SUGGEST 'SHALL BE ENTITLED

TO BE REGISTERED AS A

BRITISH NATIONAL (OVERSEAS) AND TO HOLD OR TO BE INCLUDED IN A

PASSPORT APPROPRIATE TO THAT STATUS'. AS TO USE OF THE TERM

REGISTRATION: WE REPEAT THAT THIS WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE

MEMORANDUM BECAUSE THE STATUS IN QUESTION WAS NOT RECORDED THERE

AS A NATIONALITY STATUS. THERE MUST BE SOMEWHERE A CENTRAL

RECORD OF BN (0)S. THAT RECORD WILL CONSTITUTE A REGISTER, AND

THE RECORDING IN IT WILL CONSTITUTE REGISTRATION. FOR EXAMPLE, A

PERSON APPLYING FOR BN(0) PASSPORT OUTSIDE HONG KONG WILL HAVE TO

BE FORMALLY ENTERED IN THE REGISTER, IE REGISTERED, BY THE HONG

KONG AUTHORITIES. IT IS A FORMALITY DESIGNED TO FIT WITH A

TRADITIONAL METHOD BY WHICH THE VARIOUS FORMS OF BRITISH

NATIONALITY ARE ACQUIRED UNDER OUR LAW.

D.

ARTICLE 4(3)

6. THIS IS MERELY DESIGNED TO MEET THE TERMS OF THE UK

MEMORANDUM WHEREBY A PERSON WHO IS NOT A BDTC ON 30 JUNE 1997 CANNOT REMAIN A BN (0). IT IS CONVENIENT TO SET OUT THIS

PROVISION IN THIS WAY. A BDTC COULD NOT FOR EXAMPLE RENOUNCE

BOTH BDTC AND BN(0) STATUS AT THE SAME TIME IF THAT WOULD LEAVE

HIM STATELESS. WE WOULD THEREFORE PREFER TO LEAVE THIS AS IT IS.

ARTICLE 6(3)

E.

7. NOTED.

F.

8.

TIMETABLE

SUBJECT TO OUR OBTAINING EARLY EXCO AND

MINISTERIAL APPROVAL TO THE

TERMS OF THE WHITE PAPER, WE SEE NO REASON WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE

PUBLISHED IN THE TIMESCALE ENVISAGED.

9. OUR FURTHER REVISIONS OF THE DRAFT WHITE PAPER ARE NOW ALL

INCLUDED IN MY 3 IFTS. THESE ARE MINOR AND, WE HOPE, ALL

2

CONFIDENTIAL

Share This Page