THIS LIST IS NOT BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT MIXED' BDTCS IS
A PURE CREATION OF THE 1991 ACT. MANY OF THE CUKCS WHO BECAME BDTCS WHEN THE 1981 ACT CAME INTO FORCE WERE CUKCS BY VIRTUE OF SOME
ATTRIBUTES DERIVED FROM HONG KONG AND OTHERS FROM ELSEWHERE.
PERSONS WHO BECAME BDTCS AT COMMENCEMENT OF THE BNA1981
(1) A WOMAN
SECTION UNDER
3NA 1981
S.23(1)(A)
VILL THE CHILD
LOSE BDTCSHIP
UNDER THE DRAFT
ORDER
-
IN
COUNCIL AS
CONTAINED IN
FCO TELNO 973
CF 3 JULY
LOSE
WILL THE PERSON
LOSE BDTCSHIP
UNDER OUR
PROPOSED DRAFT
ORDER ·IN·
COUNCIL
KEEP
REGISTERED AS
A CUKC IN
HONG KONG UNDER
S.6(2) OR S.6(3)
OF THE BNA 1948
ON THE GROUND OF
HER MARRIAGE TO
A CUKC WHOSE
CITIZENSHIP WAS
DERIVED FROM
ANOTHER DT
(NOTE: THIS JUSTIFIES OUR VIEWS
ABOUT REGISTRATION)
(1) A WOMAN
S.23(1)(C)
LOSE
LOSE
REGISTERED AS
A CUKC IN
ANOTHER DT, SHC
OR UK UNDER
S.6(2) OR S.6(3)
OF THE BNA 1948
ON THE GROUND OF
HER MARRIAGE TO A
CUKC WHOSE
CITIZENSHIP WAS
DERIVED FROM
HONG KONG
(1) A CUKC
REGISTERED IN
S.23(1)(A)
LOSE
KEEP
HONG KONG UNDER
S.7 OF THE 3NA
1948 ON THE
GROUND THAT HIS
MOTHER WAS A CUKC
DERIVED FROM
ANOTHER DT
·5-
(NOTE: THIS JUSTIFIES OUR VIEWS
ABOUT REGISTRATION)
CONFIDENTIAL
Jewv)