CONFIDENTIAL
implementation of the agreement, particularly in the Joint Liaison Group. We will continue to consult the people of
Hong Kong through the existing channels.
I also fully recognise the
accountability to
importance
Parliament. My
Friend has already advised against
of continuing
rt hon and learned
an institutionalised
annual debate On Hon Kong, ог a debate on an annual
report from the Joint Liaison Group,
proposed.
I share
reluctant to come to the House
-
as some members
his doubts, not because we
have
are
far from it: the House
treatment of the Government
has been very generous in its
on this subject but because I do not think it would
adequately serve the intended purpose.
I can however
reaffirm the Government's intention to ensure that Hong
Kong is regularly debated in this House, and to see that
all important developments are brought to the attention of
the House.
Returning to the Bill, its purpose is, as my rt hon Friend
said, to give the Government the necessary legislative
authority for the agreement to be ratified. A stipulated
in the agreement, this needs to be done by 30 June 1985,
questions on procedure,
relatively uncontentious.
It is short Bill and I hope a straightforward one.
today's debate
debate I think demonstrates, while there are s ome
the subject matter of the Bill is
As
CONFIDENTIAL