}
4. MEDIA INTEREST IN THE BILL HAS SUBSIDED TO SOME EXTENT AND THERE IS AN ANSWER TO MOST OF THE FURTHER POINTS MADE BY THE LEGAL PROFESSION RECENTLY. NEVERTHELESS IT REMAINS A MATTER OF CONSIDERABLE SENSITIVITY AND THERE ARE NUMEROUS CALLS FOR THE BILL
TO BE DELAYED UNTIL THE NEW LEGISLATURE ASSEMBLES IN THE AUTUMN OR
EVEN UNTIL 1987 WHEN THE CONSTITUTION REVIEW IS PROMISED. THE
DECISION TO GO AHEAD WILL IN CONSEQUENCE STILL GIVE RISE TO
CRITICISM.
5. I SHOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ANY COMMENTS DESK3Y 21C100Z JUNE.
YOUDE
LIMITED HID PS
PS/MR LUCE SIR WHARDING
MR WILSON
COPIES TONI MR FIRFOOT: LEOAL
HKGO LONDON
ADVS
il
CON.DENTIAL
D