PS
ps/ilchuck copy Private Secrclay
CONFIDENTIAL
taken
Ja
Me Luce 7.
HKK 040/5
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
M/M Ghee of
L.
1 1985
FROM: A C Galsworthy, HKD
DATE:
10 December 1984
Mr Galsworthy, HKD o/r
Sir P Cradock
Thank
CC: Dr Wilson
You
Dalett
FUTURE OF HONG KONG: DESPATCH
Mr Elliott, FED
NEGOTIATIONS
m
H. 10/1
8/113
3
ets/Led, Yovery
cc
Siilo. Hardy
1. I submit a despatch from Sir R Evans on the negotiations which
led up to the initialling of the Hong Kong agreement on 26
September.
2. The despatch is divided into five sections:
(a) An account of the negotiations (paras 2-12): This section
gives a largely factual account of the negotiations from the Prime
Minister's visit until 26 September. This may provide a useful
summary for those in Whitehall who have not followed the
negotiations as closely as we have. The Ambassador divides the
negotiations into four phases, which as he acknowledges is a
slightly artificial exercise.
(b) Negotiating Tactics: The Ambassador points out that these were
determined by the Chinese refusal to allow Hong Kong participation,
their reluctance to deal in an international treaty with what they
regarded as their internal affairs, and their suspicion of our
motives. The Ambassador deals with the technicalities of the
negotiations and pays a well earned tribute to his communicators and
the Working Groups, who he calculates worked at the rate of 50 words
per hour.
(d) The agreement: He concludes that the agreement was much beteer
than most had dared hope, and that the only real disappointments
were on nationality, defence and Government structure. He argues
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 15Page 16