- 2
It is very important that these worries should be met, whether
by us, by the Chinese Government, by the Hong Kong Government or by an adjustment in attitudes of Hong Kong people. I suggest that for
our part:-
me
eschi
File --
Сайс
Suplementary ~18.
J
Firstly, we can do our best to ensure that the International Agreement contains sufficient detail
for future arrangements to be clear - or at least
as clear as anybody's future can be in this uncertain
world. I feel sure that this is exactly what we
are doing.
Secondly, people in Hong Kong want to be sure that the
arrangements will last. Chinese leaders have said that they will last for at least fifty years from 1997. It
is very important that this should be included in the
Agreement. But additionally people in Hong Kong are concerned that the basic law which will eventually define
Hong Kong's administration under the Constitution of
China may detract from the arrangements in the Internationa
Agreement. But the Secretary of State has spoken of a
binding International Agreement. It would be helpful if
the Noble Lady, the Minister of State, would confirm that
we have no reason whatever to anticipate that the provision of the basic law will breach the provisions of the Agreemen
Many people in Hong Kong are anxious to obtain every sort
of assurance about their future and assurance piled on assurance.
This is for historical reasons which are well known. But I am afraid
that no International Agreement or assurance can be cast iron, whether in this case or in any other. However, one can say, firstly
that for a wide variety of reasons well put in the Debate in Another Place, there is every prospect of this Agreement holding up, and secondly, that a chorus of distrust from Hong Kong would be the worst possible approach to a future whose success is inescapably
bound to a close, positive and productive relationship with the
Chinese Government.
"All very..