CODE 18.77
Mr Rushford
Legal Advisers
K 188
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Reference.........
Ник 38012
RECEIVED
DEVDAY NO. 51
10 JAN SO
INDEX
No
PA ૧૯
25/1
AF20/1
HKK380/1
1981
THE MACLENNAN CASE
1 We now have the Hong Kong Crown Solicitor's views on which documents we should claim as privileged if subpoenaed by Private Eye's lawyers see Mr Jones' letter at folio (57). His
w
suggestions seem reasonable to me.
11 January 1982
Jwikiamon
P J Williamson
Hong Kong & General Department K 242
233 4439
I think
atiraw
agree.
Draft
answers
the drafts;
athaut privilege if
actually
gwch
answers to
PQs
would
Ни
gri
си
differed from
Mis
is
not
itu
сан
here
but
2
working
dralls
should
CONFIDENTIAL