DSR 11C

f

X

led to delays to the ship, a row about revised instructions to

the company's ships' masters about rescuing at sea and a flight

from the Bermuda register all of which in my view have obscure

the main issue which is that we expect Bermuda to accept

responsibility for placing any residual refugees rescued by

ships on her register.

9. Of course they successfully argued both to ourselves and to

UNHCR that Bermuda was a hopelessly unsuitable place for them.

By the time these arguments had been thrashed out, the number

left was only five and I gather you would have found it possible

to accept them. In the event the UNHCR and Bermuda prevailed

upon the USA to take them, and I understand that subsequently the

Bermudan Government have made some progress towards an informal

arrangement with Washington so that the Americans would take

any residue in future. But the nominal responsibility still

rests with Bermuda under any guarantee we issue on their behalf

as likewise it does with Hong Kong under any guarante

we issue for them.

10. My point is that just as the Americans, for reasons of

their own, can help out the Bermudans with residual refugees

dans

for whom they are responsible, we should

without prejudice to

the constitutional position be able to do the same for Hong

Kong. If, in order to help manage Hong Kong's increasingly

difficult refugee problem we were to decide that HMG would be

able to accept these 42, I think it should be possible for us

to explain to Hong Kong either that we were taking them on a

one-off basis without prejudice to our position on residual

refugees rescued by Hong Kong registered ships in future, or that we were prepared to accept residual refugees from Hong Kong

registered ships in these and future cases since it was clearly difficult for them to be settled in Hong Kong, though it would not change our formal position that in cases where we offered

--

/third

Share This Page