I

Frepared to allow any refugees who had not been resettled Prepared

form the Philippines 'within a reasonable period' to come

to a UNHCR camp in Hong Kong 'to continue to pursue their

resettlement opportunities'. Neither Embassy Manila nor

trome UNHCR there were keen on setting a three months limit, and in

the end the Philippine authorities accepted both the Hong

Kong offer and the formula 'within a reasonable period of

time'. The UNHCR officer in Manila wrote to our Embassy in

(ie. nearly this year (ater)

A

March this year to say that 15 of the refugees were still at

A

the camp at Palawan with no offers of resettlement, and could

they be taken by Hong Kong or UK?

abso

owned UKC registerd

4.

The M.V. Poyang, Hong Kong-registered, arrived at Hong Kong

on 2 July last year with 42 rescued refugees.

UNHCR registered

them straight away submitting 2 to Canada, 10 to USA for

resettlement, and asking Hong Kong to request us to take the

other 30. At the time we refused to accept them.

refugees rescued by boat were being counted against our

Although

as yet unfilled quota of 10,000 from Hong Kong, we considered

they should for the moment be left to take the same chances

for selection in the UK quota as any other refugee in

Hong Kong. The position does not seem to have been firmly

established with Hong Kong, though the 30 residual refugees

from the Po Yang stayed there, the quota has now been filled,

and in May, Hong Kong wrote again to say that 27 now

remain and could these be accepted for settlement in UK?

5. Since all possibility of resettling these 42 appears

exhausted, Hong Kong see the choice as lying between

settlement there and reception in UK. These are very

stong arguments against expecting Hong Kong to take them, and

2

/I

Share This Page