SECRET
нки
File p Mr. Moms of
174
30895 2
oyol
NR
GRS 378
SECRET
FI FCO 0114002 APRIL 82
TO PRIORITY HONG KONG (GOVERNOR)
TELEGRAM NUMBER 212 OF 1 APRIL
AND TO LISBON AND PEKING
FROM FED
FUTURE OF HONG KONG: STATUS OF MACAO
fiers sly
1. THE SECRETARY OF STATE WILL BE MEETING PORTUGUESE MINISTERS
IN LISBON 19/20 APRIL. WE ARE CONSIDERING WHETHER TO RECOMMEND
THAT HE MIGHT ASK THE PORTUGUESE FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT
WHAT THEY AGREED WITH THE CHINESE CONCERNING THE STATUS OF MACAO
BEFORE THE TWO COUNTRIES ESTABLISHED DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS IN
FEBRUARY 1979. QUESTIONS ON THESE LINES COULD BE PRESENTED AS
FOLLOWING FAIRLY NATURALLY FROM GONSALVES PEREIRA'S REMARKS
ABOUT MACAO DURING HIS MEETING WITH THE LPS LAST NOVEMBER.
2.
NR
THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS INDICIATIONS THAT MACAO'S STATUS
(AND SOVEREIGNTY) WERE RAISED AND SATISFACTORILY DEFINED BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT DURING THE NEGOTIATIONS BEFORE FEBRUARY 1979.
OUR BEST INFORMATION SO FAR CAME FROM THE PORTUGUESE CHARGE IN
PEKING IN JULY 1979 (GEORGE'S TELELETTER 020/354/1 TO SAMUEL OF
30 JULY 1979). HE SAID THAT THE CHINESE HAD PRESSED FOR AN OPEN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY PORTUGAL THAT MACAO WAS CHINESE TERRITORY BUT
HAD EVENTUALLY SETTLED FOR A PRIVATE ORAL ACCEPTANCE OF THIS
PRINCIPLE. THE PORTUGUESE HAD FEARED THAT A MORE PUBLIC STATE-
MENT WOULD LEAD TO AN OUTCRY AT HOME. THE THEN PORTUGUESE
FOREIGN MINISTER APPEARS TO HAVE DECIDED HOWEVER THAT NO DETAILS
OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON MACAO SHOULD BE PASSED TO US (SEE FOR
EXAMPLE LORD MORAN'S MINUTE OF 16 AUGUST 1979 AND SAMUEL'S
́LETTER TO GEORGE OF 30 AUGUST 1979). WE HOPE THAT THE PASSAGE OF
THREE YEARS MAY HAVE MADE THIS A RATHER LESS SENSITIVE ISSUE FOR
THE PORTUGUESE. FOR ONE THING THE CHINESE HAVE NOT BEEN ENTIRELY
DISCREET. FOR EXAMPLE, THE THEN ASSISTANT FOREIGN MINISTER, SONG
ZHIGUANG TOLD REUTERS IN MARCH 1981 THAT PORTUGAL RECOGNISED
CHINA'S SOVEREIGNTY OVER MACAO.(PEKING TELNO 22 OF 1981 TO
HONG KONG).
79
Hik 04011
/3
1
1881
Sice (395
SECRET