2

for an interview; this would be more difficult to

handle because of the inevitable focus on the future of

the territory.

3. There is a select band of British journalists

who are very knowledgeable about the Far East (for

example Richard Harris of The Times). The Prime

Minister might find it useful to set aside time for a

brief meeting with a small group of them, perhaps over

a drink, when they could talk generally about China and

Japan as they see it. This could be a useful supplement

>

!

T

to official briefing, but is a lower priority than

interviews with overseas journalists.

4. We think that a relaxed meeting with a group of

senior businessmen with Far Eastern (including Hong

Kong) interests would be very well worthwhile.

It

could include representatives of the long-established

Far Eastern trading houses, such as the Keswick family

of Jardine Matheson, and John and Adrian Swire, together

with Lord Nelson of the Sino-British Trade Council, Ian

Donald of the Hong Kong Trade Advisory Group and one or

two others on the Japan side.

Perhaps this sort of

meeting would be best done over a meal.

5.

We are not sure whether it will be right for us

to recommend that the Prime Minister entertain the

Chinese Ambassador to a meal, but it is likely that in

due course we shall recommend at least that she propose

a meeting. However the Chinese Ambassador might well

wish to invite the Prime Minister to a lunch or a

dinner before her departure.

There is unlikely to be

any such need for a meeting with the Japanese Ambassador,

/but

Page 165Page 166

Share This Page