CODE 18-77

SS 8/78

CONFIDENTIAL

Jr.

.12

GVM

Reference

120

Mr Williamson, HKGD (K 242)

HONG KONG: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION BY CHILDREN FROM CHINA

~ (112)

1. I have seen a copy of Mr Clift's minute to Mr Donaldson of 27 November, and surmise that paragraph 6 was based on remarks I made last week in response to your telephoned questions.

2. Had I realised (I regret that I did not) that the intention was to produce a submission, I would have referred to the need to consult the Home Office, since the point was one on which they lead. In any case, I fear that the third sentence of the paragraph does not reflect accurately what I said.

3. I think that the submission would have been improved by replacing its paragraph 6 with the following:

16.

HMG's view is that children are part of the family unit. If their parents are legally in the UK, then the dependent children would be allowed to join them (there is, as for most, an entry clearance procedure to prevent abuse and has resulted in some queueing in India). HMG have little practical experience of the problems dealt with in this submission, but hold that entry clearance which resulted in separation of a dependent child from one or both parents would not normally be appropriate, and such a child seeking entry (or for whom entry was sought) in such circumstances would normally be excluded. It would be important to ensure that, in excluding the child, adequate arrangements were made for its reception."

I must leave to you the question of adjusting the submission in the light of the above.

4.

MVD are always pleased to advise on the matters they handle, but find it helpful to know when a submission (or comparable paper) is involved, since immigration questions are often sensitive and Home Office concurrence is normally required.

Hkn

341

DM Sants

R M Sands

Po ulvi mi

M. will furen

Migration & Visa Dept

1 December 1981

the cuss.

суув.

"I apie X below. In any case

I do not find NWD! revised parge wink you shd, cheek with MVD that they

6 entirely clear. have no serious oyjuker to wonday of our teens dos (the 1. When I wametio de Sams love I told him are

8. However,

LE

Indomitting. He passed

in Huy Kuhom I and

draft paragraph

6

the third sentence in

Saws

2.

CONFIDENTIAL

to dre

Aold me

He

تلفيل

be

Aand

It has anyard

аджай

wording of the it renting. In

905

H

aurylene

para graph w what der

I see no need to contint as this is wit material

decision made.

Juridicom

2.12

113

Share This Page