Mr Adams

APS/Lord Trefgarne

сс

PS/LPS

Mr Donald

HKGD

SED

SAMD

CONFIDENTIAL

370A

Plas illo

Includes

HKK 34011

EVED IN SAOUSTRY NO. 51

-

- 1 OCT 1981

DESK OFFICER

DEX

PA

V

Action Take!

Mr. McQuade

Mr. Williamson J28.9

In Bhai Ji

سا

our amendments

D 25/9

Erlin

pa

28/9

See (372

373

WIAD

NATIONALITY BILL:

1.

Tels despatched

GIBRALTAR, HONG KONG AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS

When the Lord Privy Seal and Lord Trefgarne discussed the Gibraltar amendment with Mr Whitelaw and Home Office Ministers on 17 September it was decided that, as there was no prospect of reversing the amendment in the Lords, substantive action should be reserved for the Commons. It was further agreed that the spokesman in the Lords would meanwhile make clear the Government's continuing opposition to the concession, and everything possible would be done to avoid a similar concession to the Falkland Islands. No firm decision was taken on that occasion on how to meet the concerns of other dependent territories if the Gibraltar amendment stands, and in particular how to deal with any Hong Kong amendment that might be put forward in the Lords at Report Stage. We should now give this consideration

2.

The Hong Kong Government and particularly the Unofficial Members of the Executive and Legislative Councils (UMELCO), have taken a keen and critical interest in the Nationality Bill from the publication of the Green Paper. They would much prefer to remain Citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies but with some reluctance had accepted that they would become Citizens of the British Dependent Territories. The passing of the Gibraltar amendment has, however, revived their concern. They are not asking for equivalent rights to those expected by Gibraltar; in particular, they do not demand a right of entry to the United Kingdom. They do not look to the Nationality Bill to provide them with an escape route in the unlikely event of a Chinese take-over. But given the political uncertainty hanging over Hong Kong and the feeling, albeit unjustified, that HMG would like to distance themselves from the Territory, what does interest people there is a clearer expression in the Bill of the relationship between the Dependent Territories and the United Kingdom, that is of their Britishness.

3. We, for our part are unwilling to consider any amendment to the Bill, which, during the rest of this century, could be read

/as

CONFIDENTIAL

Share This Page