MKK 34 SECRET
#PELING: 076645Z OCT 81
٤٤٤٩
19 ОСТРА OC
IMMEDIATE FCO
OCTOBER
NAK
TELNO 606 OF
SECRET
392B
HKGO
Mr Daizes. нкоортафилоко
Enter
overrul Ihis. I don
INFO IMMEDIATE HONG KONG (PERSONAL FOR GOVERNOR). see that weid
is & 20 YOUR THORND 426
مین
790
FED accept
that
dre mulig
have to dibregand SP Cradlocks objection the understanding that we want brief him July Y du Chimm varsed the port.
Juvikram
13.60
Mr. Williamsy
We must nevertheless
ensure that,
we do
2
da
discusy a fall-bach
get around to
with the HO но
1
we make Peking position clear t
Them see
X opprinte
t
ĽND
NATIONALITY BILL
1. WHILST I CAN UNDERSTAND THE CONSIDERATION IN PARA 2 OF YOUR TUR, I AM AFRAID THAT MY ADVICE MUST REMAIN TO RETAIN THE BRACKETS. THE SAME FACTORS YOU MENTION IN YOUR PARA 2 AS RECOMM ENDING THE REMOVAL OF THE BRACKETS (IE THIS WOULD AVOID ANY
SUGGESTION THAT HONG KONG RESIDENTS WERE BEING ADMITTED TO A
BRANCH OF BRITISH CITIZENSHIP) AS SEEN FROM HERE RAISE THE RISK THAT THE MOVE WOULD APPEAR AS ONE TOWARDS A SEPARATE HONG KONG
"NATIONAL IDENTITY"",
2. IF THE CHINESE DEVELOPED SUCH A MISUNDERSTANDING IT WOULD NOT BE EASY TO CORRECT IT. THE LEGAL ARGUMENT THAT THE DEPENDENCIES WOULD NOT HAVE SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL CITIZENSHIP WOULD NOT ALLAY CHINESE FEARS. THEY WOULD BE CONCERNED MORE WITH THE LOOK OF THE THING THAN WITH LEGAL NICETIES. IF WE POINTED OUT THAT THE NEW DESIGNATION APPLIED TO BRITISH SUBJECTS IN ALL DEPENDENT TERRITORIES, AND WAS NOT AIMED AT HONG KONG, THEY WOULD PROBABLY RETORT THAT HONG KONG WAS A SPECIAL CASE AND THAT IT WAS NOT NECESSARILY APPROPRIATE TO TRAT UONG KONG IN THE SAME WAY AS OTHER DEPENDENT TERRITORIES FOR WHICH PERHAPS INDEPENDENCE IS
NOT OUT OF THE QUESTION.
3. A MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT THIS MATTER WOULD BE UNFORTUNATE AT THE PRESENT TIME WHEN WE ARE MUCH CONCERNED WITH THE QUESTION OF HONG KONG'S FUTURE, AND THE CHINESE WOULD BE DOUBLY SENSITIVE TO ANY HINT OF SEPARATE STATUS FOR HONG KONG RESIDENTS JUST WHEN CHINA HAS LAUNCHED A NEW INITIATIVE FOR REUNIFICATION WITH TAIWAN,
See 1417
4. I CANNOT OF COURSE STATE CATEGORICALLY THAT IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO ALLAY ANY CHINESE MISGIVINGS AND WE WOULD NATURALLY DO OUR BEST. BUT I SHOULD MUCH PREFER THAT WE SDID NOT RISK CREATING THEM. THIS RISK MAY BE OUTWEIGHED BY THE FAVOURABLE ASPECTS OF THE NEW ARRANGEMENTS (WHICH ARE OUTSIDE MY SCOPE) BUT IT SHOULD BE
RECOGNISED.
CRADOCK
LIMITED HK&GD
NTD
SED S AM D WIAD PS
PS/LPS
PS/LORD TREFGARNE MR DONALD MR ADAMS
00113/10
x
SECRET
noted fro
20110
The laul,
I
алише
that there wint
will however be put to
the Home Office? It is then for HKG) to
will be the
H.O.
say
how strong
A
11.10
resistance from +13/x