CONFIDENTIAL
$ sext
For discussion
on 24th June 1980
aadaraiqo2 sonia na a
.alesd boirog tag
機密
88(00)00%
ANNEX A TO XCC(81)3?
XCC(80)85 ored ced
Copy No
Evilatyvine kavul not toPage 12 T
1..
of 80
in e no Juo bsite. .. used ATKI
andienevidŬ MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE COUNCILjer sonka TOO DISW predt sliV
anoitusitani adi br: h
arb nasve
„bezingooer @200 PROPOSED REVISION OF FEES FOR STUDENTSpius or
AT THE UNIVERSITIES AND POLYTECHNIC
ra non bn SIL Introduction ib
moryleg wroz şic!
O
noted th
sit To University fees were last reviewed in 1977, when fees for the ensuing triennium were set at the following levels:
adi o qu 1978/79
$1,850
1979/80 $1,950
Bettienovi
s & dquage76G
10. 00:
1980/8197 $2,050 198
The 1978/79 figure represented an increase of $100 over that for 1977/78. yler.ísos mesi on vinhon2.
pro?!
msnar mi pro quo at s
MOL
to
Get
• babarotse
touch20. decenAs regards the Polytechnic, Members having considered biror memorandum XCC(76)23 on 25th May 1976, advised and the Governor
ordered: M
stoy a
ثارة evins
dgol redforta sbiosu od mobu Jesonate ''(d).. that the proposal of the Board of Governors to increase3zont
fees to $700 for new students on full-time courses in the academic year 1976-77 and to $1,000 in 1977-78 and in -proved one subsequent academic years should be endorsed ?. pindoeivio bate ghetsvinü aŭ al
D
msay soold gier gritsivolno :
421
ft
ia di acet
3d vid The question of the timing of future reviews of fees was subse- quently considered, and in a letter to the Chief Secretary dated 18th April 1977, the Chairman of the University and Polytechnic Grants Committee stated:
SHT
• ...
J
A stojos'd
If (a fixed increase of university fees) were to be applied for the academic year starting September 1978 it of barlar, od owould need to be announced not less than a year earlier;
and ought probably to be reviewed in early 1980 in time mobanfora revision to be announced (if judged necessary) by Amory mid-1980, A similar system could be applied to the
Polytechnic, but the initial time-table should perhaps be tegnol is uq different because Polytechnic tuition fees were revised 90 / --
...for September 1976. In these circumstance's they could
hyperhaps be left unchanged for the triennium - that is, wap.their next revision might be announced by mid-1980 and
>would thereafter remain in step with the Universities.
notsak
?
{
༣ ་
:assy gili savo erooni osi mavi qut
It is considered appropriate to review at this time the fee levels both at the Universities and at the Polytechnic.
CONFIDENTIAL ##
機密