Distribution:-
Copies to:-
1475(H) M8S 427223 400M 5/77 A.G. 3640/4
File No.....
Department
NTD
OUTWARD
Drafted by
W Jones
TELEGRAM
(Block Capitals)
213-3794
Tel. Extn..
DESK BY
FOR
COMMS. DEPT.
(Date)
USE
Despatched
POSTBY....
(Time)
..........Z
PREAMBLE
Security Classification
CONFIDENTIAL
Precedence
PRIORITY
XY 42
Z
............Z
(Time of Origin)
(Security Class.) CONFIDENTIAL
(Codeword)
TO PRIORITY
(precedence)
AND TO (precedence/post).
Z(G.M.T.)
PEKING
(post)
(Restrictive Prefix)..... (Caveat]
Privacy Marking)...
(Deskby)........
...........Z
Tel. No.
uf.
fo
(Priority) HONG KONG (Personal for Aeting Governor)
AND SAVING TO...........
REPEATED TO (for info).............
SAVING TO (for info)..........
[TEXT]
Your telno 41 and Bangkok telno 60 (from Cradock): NATIONALITY LAW.
As you will realize from FCO telno 32 of 17 January
alternative la は we need to consider to
assumption that it will be
s potatr the title CUKC in any form. We are
comments therefore considering titles in the light of points raised
by Hong Kong and other dependent territories the titles
to reply to
in in, FCO telno 19 Personal to Governors. We should be
grateful for your views on the likely Chinese reaction to
Brinish Citizen (Hong Kmy)-
די
Mke
two possibilities::"British (Hong Kong) Citizen" or Jor
"British Dependent TerritorysCitizen (Hong Kong)". Since
the reference to Hong Kong will be partly separate from the
two, these formulae should be less open to the objections
you have suggested. Is this right?
CONFIDENTIAL
/3.