groups who are strongly opposed to abortion, e. g. the Catholic Church and certain other bodies. There may also be criticism in some quarters that the reforms do not go far enough, particularly among the younger generation. However, it is expected that the majority of the local community will accept the proposals. It is unlikely that there will ever be a consensus of opinion on this subject and careful publicity will be necessary to minimise adverse public reaction. It is proposed that an inter-departmental committee should be set up to oversee the publicity arrangements and to prepare the necessary background material for issue with the publication of the bills. It is intended that the bills should be published for information at the time when consultation with the medical profession begins, in view of the likelihood of leaks. It will be made clear that the purpose of publication is that there should be informed debate during consultation. If any amendments of a significant nature prove necessary as a result, Members' advice will be sought before the amendments are incorporated in the bill for introduction into the Legislative Council.
Advice sought
32
Members will be asked to advise whether the Offences Against the Person (Amendment) Bill 1980 and the Undesirable Medical Advertise - ments (Amendment) Bill 1980, at Annexes B and C, should be approved in principle for introduction into the Legislative Council, after the consultations referred to in paragraphs 12 and 14 and subject to any minor amendments that may be necessary as a result.
(The Secretary for Social Services (Mr E. P. HO), the Director of Medical and Health Services (Dr K. L. THONG) and Senior Crown Counsel (Mr J.D. SCOTT) will attend before the Council for the discussion of this item).
1st April 1980
(CR 16/3231/67 III)
COUNCIL CHAMBER
G.S. 166
CONFIDENTIAL #