with it's obligations it's functions is
it looks as
a
a
to the scope of
bit thin since
if this is the best,
only puttefiraa vesponce Mr Evans allegatives.
a
3.
What yous ques
6
into the letter is a
matter essentially of policy
you may
paray caph such as
hut
wish to consider ladding
I have suggested which might point CPA not arguing
in the draft, to the desicability of
puthier for although
7.
a
a
one
new canier decision,
as concction
in the quise of mistaken assection made by Us Event.
Lichard Gardina Legal Advicces 9/4/80