to SELL. It is for us as Ministers to give them maximum support,
indicate our interest in overseas markets and show our faces to
the British trading community abroad and our potential customers
overseas.
11 Thirdly, we have indicated our determination to bring
forward albeit contentious legislation to defend British interests against attempts by other countries to assert extra-
territorial jurisdiction. The Protection of Trading Interests
Bill which is now before Parliament considerably extends our
powers to block unwarranted demands on British businesses from
overseas countries and signals in particular our resistance
to the system of penal awards for off-shore infringements of
US anti-trust law.
12
Fourth, we are now reviewing the organisation of our export
services. The Rayner Report which has just come before Ministers:
will receive the closest scrutiny and consultation. I am sure
that in the next year or so we must make a priority in cur
trading arrangements, the simplifying of procedures, the
streamlining of the export promotion services and the production
of an altogether more rational organisation on the export side
than we have had up to now. I announced a few weeks ago the
abolition of Import Surveillance Licensing. Here was but one
small example of an extremely bureaucratic process involving British industry and commerce in considerable expense and time for no material purpose. I said at the time: "National surveillance licensing involved a substantial burden on industry and government: it was expensive in terms of manpower and time
and its impact on reducing imports was minimal. I am glad to see another costly piece of unnecessary bureaucracy disappear".
13 Fifth, we are concerned as was the previous Government about unemployment, and we accept that subsidies or temporary protection may in certain cases have to be used to soften hardship
and ease change. But subsidies are the worse form of non-tariff
barrier to trade.
We do not believe that continuing overmanning,
5