CONFIDENTIAL
-3-
―
STAFF IN CONFIDENCE
internal self-government and against the willingness or otherwise
of Ministers to ask Parliament to act against the wishes of the
dependencies, whether by outright abolition or by a temporary
suspension of the exercise of the death penalty. Apart from this
there remains the very important point that in Hong Kong, where the
death penalty still exists but where executions have not been carried
out since 1973, the Governor is of the view that any move by London
to take more formal steps in the direction of abolition would lead to
serious protests.
Ministers
8. I do not therefore recommend any change of policy.
will, however, wish to be aware of the burden of the demands placed
upon Governors and of the possible consequences.
personal and political.
9.
These are both
In Mr Davidson's case, his conscience may possibly oblige him
to resign rather than allow the law to take its course.
It can, of
course, be argued that Mr Davidson should not have accepted an
appointment where he knew that such a decision would be required.
It is, however, only fair to point out that when Mr Davidson was
appointed in 1978, he was told that the aim of the then British
Government was, if possible, to avoid any more executions taking
place. At all events, he is now asking to be relieved so far as
possible of the ultimate responsibility.
10. Mr Davidson has suggested that capital cases in the Dependent
Territories should automatically be referred to the Judicial Committee of
the Privy Council. Legal advice, however, is that this is not
possible under the present rules. The Judicial Committee can only
consider whether a case appears to have involved some legal error
which would justify their reviewing it. They are not bound to conduct
CONFIDENTIAL
STAFF IN CONFIDENCE
/an