ment of 22nd June 1972, Ringeisen case, the Court afforded to one of the applicants, in accordance with Article 50 of the Convention, a just satisfaction consisting of an indemnity. The judgment was the object on 23 June 1973 of an inter- pretation judgment by the Court.
In a judgment of 17 January 1970, the Court found that there was no violation of the Convention in the Delcourt case, which had been referred by the Commission in 1969 and which concerned the participation of the Public Prosecutor of the Belgian "Cour de Cassation" to the sitting of this Court.
In a judgment of 18 June 1971, the Court found a violation of one of the various points raised by three cases of "vagrancy" which the Belgian Governments had referred to the Court. Some weeks later the Belgian legislation involved was modified.
On 10 March 1972, the Court delivered a judgment on the request of indemnity in the Wilde, Ooms and Versyp case (vagrancy). This request was not accepted.
On 7 May 1974, the Court delivered judgment, in ac- cordance with Article 50, in the Neumeister case. The Court awarded to the applicant 30,000 Schillings for his lawyers' expenses.
On 21 February 1975, the Court delivered a judgment in the "Golder case" which concerned the United Kingdom. In its judgment, the Court held that there had been a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights on two issues. The Court considered that the refusal by the Home Secretary in 1970 to allow Mr. Golder who was then serving a sentence in Parkhurst Prison, to consult a solicitor with a view to bring- ing a civil action against a prison officer contravened both Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention.
Four cases, which have been referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights, are still pend- ing the "Belgian National Police Union Case" which con- cerns Belgium, the "Swedish Engine Drivers Union Case" and the "Schmidt and Dahlström Case" which concerns Sweden, and the "Five Dutch Soldiers Case" which concerns the Netherlands.
24
Lawless Case
—
Judgments given by the European Court of Human Rights
Preliminary exceptions and questions of procedure: Judgment
of 14 November 1960.
—
Judgment of 7 April 1961.
Merits Judgment of 1 July 1961.
De Becker Case
Judgment of 27 March 1962.
Case "relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium”.
Preliminary exceptions; devision of 3 May 1966; Judgment
of 9 February 1967.
Merits Judgment of 23 July 1968.
Wemhoff Case
-
Judgment of 27 June 1968.
Neumeister Case
Judgment of 27 June 1968.
Stögmüller Case
Judgment of 10 November 1969.
Matznetter Case
Judgment of 10 November 1969.
Delcourt Case
Judgment of 17 January 1970.
De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp Case (Vagrancy)
Decision of 28 May 1970;
Question of procedure: Judgment of 18 November 1970; Judgment of 18 June 1971;
Judgment of 10 March 1972 (Question of the application of Article 50 of the Convention).
Ringeisen Case
Judgment of 16 July 1971;
Judgment of 22 June 1972 (Question of the application of Article 50 of the Convention);
Judgment of 23 June 1973 (Interpretation of the judgment of 22 June 1972).
Neumeister Case
-
Judgment of 7 May 1974 (Article 50).
Golder Case
Judgment of 21 February 1975.
25