10.
Cmmd 6400 and proceed on the basis that
the grant of a licence to CPA would be
no less consistent with the purposes of
fostering the development of the United
Kingdom's trade and tourism and strengthen-
ing the balance of payments of the United
Kingdom than the grant of such a licence
to BCAL or Laker.
20.
We have inserted (b)(ii) to cover the
possibility that the previous Guidance (Commd 4899) may
have some residual effect which favours BCAL.
21.
In our view, the directions we propose could
lawfully be made by the Secretary of State and could
not be effectively challenged on the principles of
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223 and Secretary of State for
Education & Science v. Tameside Metropolitan Borough
Council [1977] A.C. 1014.
Rhijst.
Bank Pitter. Там
Pothen.
Fountain Court, Temple, EC4.
2nd August 1979.