CONFIDENTIAL

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

A voluntary scheme would add considerably to the

administrative complexities of a contributory

social insurance scheme. For this reason, GAD

has expressed a preference for a compulsory scheme.

The voluntary element would make it difficult to

estimate with any accuracy income from

contributions and hence to set benefits at the

right level from the outset. GAD's advice is that

the scheme would tend to attract the older less

healthy members of the workforce for whom the chance

of claiming benefit is greater than for younger

people. If this were so, the scheme would not be

successful in attracting support from many young

employees who ought to be covered for benefit

and for whom the scheme was also designed.

Because of the uncertainty mentioned at (b),

contributions would probably need to be set at a

higher level than in a fully compulsory scheme

to ensure a reasonable spread of benefits.

Employers, trade union representatives and social

workers have commented on the possibility of

discriminatory employment practices resulting from

a scheme where an employee could commit his

employer to the additional cost of contributing

to a social insurance scheme. Such practices

would be difficult to prevent in practice because

proof would be hard to come by. They would tend

to restrict mobility of labour which is vital to

Hong Kong's economy.

CONFIDENTIAL

/The

Share This Page