Jon Prescott
Summary & some main posits amning our of the Discussion with F+CO
represcurative. on Sarwday 6. May 1978.
•
The Arguments pur formais by the Heritage Siziety have been countered by
the HK Government (Pwo. Horough Beary Farisonment?)
Whas admitted that more creditid (weight) was given Lotte Piccal
prescuraten of "facts."
NB the Heritage Scriety has NEVER bea give credible facts. /argument this is the ofthe MAJOR factors in the disgreat. Ennemia in ar cerrain KwaZEDGE has been guilty of a convicing misrepresenttent
слити, of the thith Szice 1974.
they have consistents refused to discos the true sirvation Jace to face in Technical terms.
QUALIFIED 120.
[NB.
WHICH SEVERAL OF OUR ComaMITTEE ARE PERFECITY
On the the recoour when the Heritage friste, aurici pored at prof For DISCUSSION -over VicToRNA BARRACKS. When we began to pse
IN
#
questions we were in formed that "Governments" Committee was one there t hörent or case & Heard our coined
NO DIALOGUE ensued.]
2. W was partous than the Herivage friet was making a case for
(i) breservation (we prefer CONFERVATION) of the KCR Termice Building (ii) Greaves participation of the public in the Town Planning process. (iii) Consauration ofthe Herage gsting King +greaves considvath gase
overall environ thet.
11
Whit Sveviate of the peoples untwert in (ii) + (iii) was accepted by ita F+CD represervative
Iis was dismissed Jora number of reaso