Cuppatties shill

DOI OF TRYING ON HIM WHAT HE THOUGHT BB WERE TRYING ON THE DEPARTMENT.

3. SIR LAWRENCE HAD BEEN INSTRUCTED BY HIS BOARD NOT TO DO ANYTHING

IN DISCUSSION WITH THE UK WHICH WOULD PREJUDICE CLP'S GOINT TO INTERNATIONAL TENDER. HOWEVER, HE HAD DECIDED TO PASS TO US CLP'S

BREAKDOWN OF THEIR ESTIMATED PRICE. HIS BOARD DID NOT KNOW HE WAS DOING THIS, AND IT MUST NOT BE USED AGAINST HIM BY THE UK. (IT LATER EMERGED THAT THE FIGURES HAD ALREADY BEEN PASSED TO DOI BY

STONES, AFTER DISCUSSION WITH SIR LAWRENCE). THE FIGURES WERE FOR DOI ONLY. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HIGHLY UNETHICAL FOR CLP TO PASS THEM

TO THE CONTRACTOR.

4. IF THERE WAS NO CHANGE IN THE UK'S POSITION, SIR LAWRENCE

ADVISED JOHN LIPPITT NOT TO COME. IT WOULD BE EMBARRASSING FOR

HIM AND WOULD LOOK WORSE IF A CLP REFUSAL HAD TO COME TO HIM

PERSONALLY DURING HIS VISIT. HE ADVISED LIPPITT TO WAIT UNTIL THE

MATTER WAS ADJUSTED, AND IF IT COULD NOT BE RESOLVED IT WOULD BE

BETTER TO LET THE UK PROPOSAL FADE. AT ANOTHER POINT HE SUGGESTED

THE PROBLEM SHOULD BE QUOTE 99 PERCENT SORTED UNQUOTE BEFORE

LIPPITT CAME.

5. KADOORIE ALSO SUGGESTED 6 NOVEMBER MIGHT PERHAPS BE TOO SOON.

CLP WOULD DO THEIR BEST TO DELAY FOR A BIT IF IT WOULD BE PROFITABLE: BUT IF THERE WAS NO REAL HOPE OF PROGRESS THEY SHOULD

BE TOLD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, SINCE THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET OTHERS

IN QUICKLY.

LINKS WITH HONG KONG ELECTRIC.

6 IN AN EXTENDED DIGRESSION SIR LAWRENCE DISCUSSED THE EFFECTS

ON CLP AND ON UK PROJECTS OF LINKS WITH HKE. THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY HAD AT A RECENT MEETING STRESSED TO HIM THAT INTEGRATION

HAD TO COME.

7. SIR LAWRENCE READ EXTRACTS FROM A HONG KONG GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT DESCRIBING EXCO'S APPROACH TO THE QUESTION. THE DOCUMENT (EXCO

MINUTES ?) INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING POINTS..

8. EXCO HAD BEEN MOST INSISTENT, IN GRANTING PERMISSIONS FOR LAMMA AND TAP SHEK KOK (CASTLE PEAK), ON INTERCONNECTION BY 1982, IE WHEN THE FIRST SETS AT THE TWO STATIONS CAME ON STREAM.

FURTHER INSTALLATIONS THEREAFTER - PREFERABLY INCLUDING LATER SETS AT THESE TWO SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN INTEGRATED INVESTMENT PROGRAMME.

9. EXCO HAD NOT MADE PLANNING PERMISSIONS CONTINGENT ON

Share This Page