- 6 -

But of course there isn't going to be a total substitution

of imports by domestic production. There will be no restrictions on

imports from developed countries and althoug: there will be severe

restrictions on imports from developing coun ries, the quotas haven't

been reduced to zero.

I have little doubt that a simila: study in other developed

countries would produce similar results. It just happened that

Mr. Cable's article came to my hand as I was preparing this speech.

If Mr. Cable is right, and if the situation is similar

elsewhere, the Community's restrictive policy is not likely to

produce the effects expected of it. It's like putting a drug on

the market without doing any research on its effects. All the

patients will suffer: the developing countries, the developed

countries' consumers and indeed in the long run their textile

industries also.

However, the sad fact is that unemployment and the "flood

of imports" are for the time being linked in many minds.

So, we were faced with an EEC prepared to ignore the MFA,

prepared even to disregard the formula of "reasonable departures"

from the MFA, which the Community itself had supported in the Textiles

Committee in July. The Departures they sought were aptly described

by one developing country representative as not reasonable but radical.

Despite the Community's attitude, the Hong Kong team was

determined to act in accordance with our international obligations

and we did so. We refused absolutely to negotiate on any point that

could not be justified under the MFA or GATT and, in the end, the

Community had to impose some unfavourable elements in the package

upon Hong Kong.

/So

Share This Page