CONFIDENTIAL
82
布政司署
香港下亞
畢道
本署檔號 OUR REF:
SCR 13/4841/59
* Your Ref.:
J T/Masefield Esq
Far Eastern Department F C O
ес MACAU
Randle,
acol
GOVERNment SECRETARIAT
LOWER ALBERT ROAD
HONG KONG
22 July, 1978
syy.
I Thompson
HKK_040/1
£318
RAGLIAD MARISMAY MO. 51
D. NK 0.
INDEX
4 AUG 1978
PA
No
bb
Action Ten
Chr
I am conscious of writing far too many words recently about minor points of detail connected with Portuguese negotiations to establish diplomatic relations with China and the question of Macau. At the expense of becoming tedious on the subject, I think it is still worth taking note of an apparent misunderstanding by the Portuguese Foreign Minister (and indeed Reg Hibbert) about the historical status of Macau.
2.
In the record of the conversation between the Secretary of State and Dr Sa Machado on 30 June, the latter is quoted as saying that "Macau was held by Portugal under an unwritten convention. There was no treaty". A similar point is made later by Reg Hibbert. In fact there is a treaty, although it came late in the day after the Portuguese had already been established in Macau for over 300 years. Following successful attempts by other powers to annex parts of China (including Hong Kong), the Portuguese signed a treaty in 1887 under which the Chinese conceded that Macau was an inalienable part of Portugal in perpetuity. treaty is, of course, considered by the Chinese to be an "unequal" one. This is why, in their official statements, the Chinese lump together the questions of both Hong Kong and Macau, saying that both derive from unequal treaties and that both are historical problems to be settled "when conditions are ripe".
This
(D C Wilson)
сс
M I Goulding Esq (LISBON)
K Sullivan Esq (PEKING)
Research Department (Far Eastern Section)
CONFIDENTIAL
eve
loved