the lalanders had been consulted or were to be" The PM replied in the

negative to both and added (rather lamely, since it hud never been

referred to) that a plebiscite was alion to British political traditione

and he saw no need for one anyhow; such objections as the Heligolanders о

had expressed in the past to association with Germany arose from their

of conscription and, as the official announcement indicated, care had

been taken to provide for their exemption from the German conscription

law. In this and other early PQs there was an obvious pressure to make

the cession subject to Parliamentary sanction for the purpose of

*

for,

KL

I find pro

ཏ་་མ* ཅནལ་ཁྱིལ

securing some means of expression/or protection of Heligoland wishes.

A further PQ in the Lords of the same day asked the Govt to state,

before the Bill was submitted to Parliament, what steps had been taken

to ascertain the wishes of the islanders and for confirmation (or

otherwise) of a statement by the Colonial Pecretary in 1885 that

official information indicated that the Heligolanders were averse to transfer to Germany. The Colonial Secretary replied that in 1885/ no

exemption from conscription had been proposed, and he indicated that no

staps had been taken to ascertain the Heligolanders' views. Pressed

further, he replied that "HMG have reason to believe that the Heligo-

laners are not dissatisfied with the change". The Foreign Under-Secret-

ary was then asked in the Commons (20 June) what steps would be taken

to ascertain their wishes, to which he replied that HMG had reason for

believing that the arrangement (i.e. the safeguards) might well remove

the chief objections of the islanders. Again pressed (23 June) to say

expressly whether the Heligolanders had been consulted, the First Lord

of the Treasury (W. H. Smith) evaded answering and added only that HMG

believed the Agreement would "certainly not be disadvantageous to the

Helioglanders". But in reply to a similar question on the same day

the Colonial Pecretary rdplied plainly that "no steps have been taken

to ascertain he views of the inhabitants" and sought justification in

GD their exemption from conscription. Further pressed with a reference о

to reports of recent demonstrations in lleligoland against transfer in

the English press and elsewhere, the Colonial Secretary desclaimed

any official information on these events.

nial

On 24 June one MP asked (for answer by the FM) "whether in

accordance with the Ionian Islands precedent, the Govt would undertake

Share This Page