S.A.T.
(Pt. 8 to Ft. 10)
1
C.0. III
(male)
C.O. II
(Pt. 3 to Pt. 16)
c.o. 111.9. 11 III C.0. II
(female)
(Ft. 3 to Pt. 16)
300 (75%)
Pt. 3
400
Pt. 4
435
325
Pt. 5
470
355
Pt. G
510
385
Pt. 7
550
415
(Revised)
Pt. 8
445
(420)
590
445
Pt. 9
475
(450)
030
475
Pt.10
5054 (485)
670
670
505/
505
Pt. 11
550
(18-)
730
550
Pt.12
595
(555)
790
505
Pt. 13
640
(505)
850
640
Pt.14
085 (635)
910
685
Pt.15
730 (075)
070
730
Pt.16
775 (720-765)
1030
775
The Government did not adopt the revised salary ($445–$775) proposed by the 1965 Salaries Commission; as a result, S.A.T. wore already underpaid with the Government proposed scale ($420-$705) at that time.
(c) The Equal Pay Scheme was first implemented in 1971; salary
points for S.A.T.s were shortened from 10 to 8- a movement which contradictod the principle of Priestley Report that "good caployers are likely to be among the more progressive
in all aspects of management policy. Their rates of rammeration will compere well with those of the generality of employers, vill pove readily but not atypically upward when the trend is in that direction and will be rather more stäble than post when the trend is downwards."уThe 1971 Salaries Commission Report Chapter 1 Page 1 Clanse 10 hinted that the above fresh riovoment by Government was obviously unfair to S.A.T.s but commented that it will not be proper for the Commission to intervene.
" We have no comm
of the part of women officers. Our recommendations at this sploit.
arrangements move by Grovt to.
in sholly of manly use by women/(a)
to frose condes which
and which do not gratis of the the scheure of egne gution of par
we were tend that of s
hose pro basals work the suto