423
673
Ve!
not
671
as tat
oth masters/
выпря
672
10
400.
nearer
ne was
Why start off
le had been
fio
purpose of his admission, it does not matter whether he mentioned 2D in Deptember or earlier because he never mentioned 20 until after his con- viction and this goes to his credit. He was asked why he did not mention tis conversation with 2D on tape recordings and he said it was not important. At one time he said he had saved it up for later going to have 6 interviews with ICAC and he saved it up for later. explanation why he wanted to save it up. Once again au as treating whole case in a derisory way. Is it conceivable that according to him he does not think it sufficiently important to mention in 3 tapes the very first senior officer he approaches to try to corrupt. One would have thought that if a C contemplated corrupting senior officers he would have started with someone
his own level, an Inspector, but according to him he went straight off and profhom he had not
apirosghed. known before and asked 2 if he was interested in getting some extra income. If the 2 and 3 senior officers were sufficiently important to include in these 3 tapes why was not the first? In any event this story of having approached 2 is somewhat extraordinary. your efforts to corrupt senior officers with some ADS. in police come 20 years he must have known when it came to raids and
so forth it won't come to AD, but he starts off with a short conversation according to him and 20 accepted 10,000 on conditio.us same as 1D which he had mentioned. Indeed it is quite surprising these 2 interviews he had with these 2 were extremely similar. It is unbelievable that it did
happen. How did it come about? He was of course under considerable pressure he was in iu Lam and he got amnesty and he agreed he got a bargain, he would tell ICAC things and then he got that and in exchange he got a letter from Attorney General.
was in his cun interest quite regardless of the truth. He said in
cross-examination that what he was asking for was a reduction in his sentence which he said on more than 1 occasion was not a light one. Submit that he was probably living in great style before he went to prison. Find it irksome and had to get out as soon as he could and ready to tell any lie if he thought his aim could be achieved. Also another matter preying on his mind that is he may have been aware he got a heavy sentence. Some people might look upon it as a light sen- tence and there are provisions whereby light sentences could be reviewed by a higher Court.
He mould say anything which