347
524
324.
Q.
in my experience of 26 years that was not the common practice. Circumstances are in a way similar to use of sec.
14 of a non- Urdinance offence it is very easy to say we are investigating offence under the Crdinance when the true purpose of using those
provisions under the Crdinance when it was to investigate
another offence?
That could be possible but highly unlikely.
Court adjourned 15 minutes.
(ed.)
A.
Garcia
District Judge
2/12/75
Court resumes at 11.55
Appearances as before.
B. Clarke on former cath, states
Cross-examined by Gunston
You mentioned Wong brothers earlier on?
A.
Yes.
You were concerned with information coming from the ong brothers? Allonst others.
A.
2.
They tell you who they were working for?
4.
Not to me direct. 1 personally didn't interview them.
Some of my
colleagues did.
A.
•
A.
Q.
A.
Jid you know who they alleged they worked for?
Not entirely. They alleged they were working for a sergeant.
which sergeant?
I am not sure. 1 don't know what evidence they gave.
What sergeant did they say they worked for?
For a sergeant. 1 am not sure which one.
You remember going on to see Lau Cheong Wa in siu Lan last september?
I have seen him on a number of occasions.
It may well have been in september.
I don't recall the dates.
According to prison record you went with Mr. Guy on 22/9?
That seems right to me. 1 accept that if it was in prison record.
A.
525
4.