297
448
449
274.
1st December 1975
Coral: A. Garcia, D.J. in Court.
+
Court re.ules at 10 a.m.
Appearances as before.
LAU CHEUNGA on former affirmation, states:
LU: Un last occasion in answer to Mr. Hampton's cross-examination I
told Court that I have spent $50,000 as solicitor's fee.
I now remember the fee was 150,000.
Cross-examined by Mr. Hampton:
A.
In fact,
I put it to you your evidence in this case in its material particulars
is se?
No. The truth.
Cross-examined by Mr. Gunston:
the
ณ.
A.
4.
hen you mentioned fee just now did that mean solicitor's fee for K.K. Chu & Co.
ies.
Tou also had other solicitors visiting you called H.K. La 2. Co. when you were in Siu Lam?
I think he was solicitor for my wife.
Your wife also employs solicitor - a different firm from yourself? Correct.
lour solicitor's fee was paid only in respect of assets which you had under your control above your emoluments?
les.
•
And that included
Tes.
a Counsel' s fee?
And how did you not account for such a large sun when lir. Hampton last asked you?
This 150,000 was part of my corrupt money.
4.
Did you pay by cheque?
A.
No. In cash.
2.
You mean you were keeping a large sum of cash by you at time you were arrested or prosecuted?
A.
Io.
.. Where did that come from?