203
294
Q.
180.
A.
C.
A.
Q.
A.
A.
8 4 8 A4
Q.
A.
ميات
A.
વી.
Later I saw his photo in newspapers. I have not seen his photo elsewhere except in newspapers.
Could it be that you identified him on 10/11 from what you saw in newspapers?
No.
}
His picture has been in newspapers quite often during past few months?
I did not identify 1st Accused from photos I saw in newspapers because I had seen him in person 3 times before. How old are you?
54.
Did you tell ICAC you were 51?
A
When I applied for identity card clerk put down my age younger. Then I pointed it out to the clerk he said it
was alright.
Did you tell ICAC your true age was 54 but your age in identity card was wrong?
I did not.
I put it to you that in fact your evidence about seeing 1st Accused in presence of a Hak Shing shortly after you wert to Causeway Bay is not true?
It is trio.
I suppose not having your glasses on morning in no way affected your ability to identifying 1st Accused?
No.
In spite of your age?
I only require my spectaclos when I am reading newspapers.
Mr. Sceats: No re-examination.
Court: Q. You shown this morning Exhis. P70 & P71?
A.
A.
Q.
A.
*
Yes.
And you were asked as to how you got the information to put down in these 2 exhibits?
Yes.
And you said you were supplied with the information by
Uncle Luk?
Yes.